String Theory: The Failed Theory of Everything

A mad scientist of String theory

After fifty years of intense research, String theory has faced mounting skepticism, even from some of its founders. Leonard Susskind, regarded as one of the pioneers of String theory, recently stated that the theory we understand today bears no meaningful connection to the real world. This admission underscores a fundamental problem that critics, including the fictional Dr. Rebecca Riesen in my book Infernum, have long pointed out: despite its elegant mathematical framework, String theory has made zero verifiable predictions and provided no insights into observable phenomena in physics. It is a failed theory of everything.

Infinite Universes, Zero Evidence

Initially proposed as a way to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity, String theory introduced the idea that the fundamental particles are not point-like but rather tiny vibrating strings. Over time, however, it became clear the theory predicts an unmanageable landscape of possible universes—estimates range up to 10^500 potential universes—making it nearly impossible to test or falsify. This was a central point made by Dr. Riesen, a brilliant physicist in Infernum. Three hundred years in the future, String theory still has its adherents, but neither they nor their theory have come any closer to validation. Dr. Riesen savages them both on several occasions (channeling my feelings about the subject).

The Emperor Has No Clothes

Last month, Dr. Leonard Susskind, regarded as one of the fathers of String theory, offered comments that align with these criticisms. In an interview, he admitted the following:

I can tell you with absolute certainty String theory is not the theory of the real world, I can tell you that 100% …. My strong feelings are exactly that String theory is definitely not the theory of the real world.

—Leonard Susskind

He now believes that the version of String theory we have today cannot explain the physical world. Instead, he posits that some future, unknown theory might draw inspiration from String theory, but it will require entirely new equations that we do not yet understand. The equations that might describe our universe remain elusive, and current versions of String theory are largely disconnected from experimental science.

A Philosophy, Not a Science

String theory’s failure lies in its inability to bridge the gap between beautiful mathematics and empirical science. As Susskind has acknowledged, its status today is closer to speculative philosophy than a working theory of physics, which is why many physicists, including fictional ones like Dr. Riesen, have grown increasingly frustrated with it.

It’s time for the physics community to move on from String theory. They should refocus their efforts on scientific approaches that can be tested, verified, and can ultimately contribute to real progress in understanding the universe

Jayson Adams is a technology entrepreneur, artist, and the award-winning and best-selling author of two science fiction thrillers, Ares and Infernum. You can see more at www.jaysonadams.com.